4.7 Article

Local luminosity function at 15 microns and galaxy evolution seen by ISOCAM 15 micron surveys

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 541, Issue 1, Pages 134-141

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/309401

Keywords

galaxies : luminosity function, mass function; galaxies : photometry; galaxies : starburst; galaxies : statistics; infrared : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A local luminosity function at 15 mu m is derived using the bivariate (15 pm vs. 60 mu m luminosity) method, based on the newly published ISOCAM LW3 band (15 mu m) survey of the very deep IRAS 60 mu m sample in the north ecliptic pole region (NEPR). New IRAS 60 pm fluxes are obtained using the SCANPI/SUPERSCANPI software at the new ISOCAM positions of the sources in the sample. It is found to be in excellent agreement with the 15 mu m local luminosity function published by Xu et al., which is derived from the predicted 15 mu m luminosities of a sample of IRAS 25 mu m-selected galaxies. Model predictions of number counts and redshift distributions based on the local luminosity function and assumptions of its evolution with redshift are calculated and compared with the data of ISOCAM 15 mu m surveys. Strong luminosity evolution on the order of L proportional to(1 + z)(4.5) is suggested in these comparisons, while pure density evolution can be ruled out with high confidence. The sharp peak at about 0.4 mJy in the Euclidean normalized differential counts at 15 mu m can be explained by the effects of midinfrared broadband emission features, eliminating the need for any hypothesis for a new population. It is found that the contribution from the population represented by ISOCAM 15 mu m sources can account for the entire IR/submillimeter background, leaving little room for any missing new population which can be significant energy sources of the IR/submillimeter sky.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available