4.7 Article

Reproductive biology and conservation implications of three endangered snapdragon species (Antirrhinum, Plantaginaceae)

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 142, Issue 8, Pages 1854-1863

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.025

Keywords

Antirrhinum charidemi; Antirrhinum subbaeticum; Antirrhinum valentinum; Conservation; Inbreeding depression; Mating system; Pollen limitation

Funding

  1. Spanish General Direction of Scientific and Technical Research (DGICYT [REN2002-02434/GLO]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

About 32% of Antirrhinum species are considered to be endangered; however, no field studies have focused on their reproductive biology. In this work, several aspects of the reproductive biology (flowering phenology, floral biology, breeding system) and potential limits on seed quantity and quality (pollen limitation, inbreeding depression) were studied in natural populations of three endangered species of the genus (Antirrhinum charidemi, Antirrhinum subbaeticum, Antirrhinum valentinum). Results disclose that all three species need insect visitors for seed production since fruit set after autonomous self-pollination was lower than under hand cross-pollination. A. charidemi and A. valentinum were mainly self-incompatible, whereas A. subbaeticum was self-compatible but herkogamous. Supplementary pollination in open-pollinated flowers only increased fruit set and seed set relative to controls in a given population of A. valentinum. Preliminary data on inbreeding depression at early life-cycle stages of the self-compatible A. subbaeticum revealed that the cumulative level was low. Despite the three species being closely related and sharing many ecological characteristics, they show different mating systems, and different factors limit seed quantity and quality. Thus, caution should be taken when making a common conservation plan for a group of closely related taxa. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available