4.7 Article

Linking monitoring and intervention for improved management of tigers in the Sundarbans of Bangladesh

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 141, Issue 8, Pages 2032-2040

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.05.018

Keywords

abundance; adaptive management; Panthera tigris; power analysis

Funding

  1. Forest Department of Bangladesh
  2. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Banglalink
  3. University of Minnesota's Agricultural Experiment Station

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Baseline data on distribution and abundance of tigers in the Sundarbans is required to identify problem areas and evaluate management strategies. This paper outlines a khal (creek) bank survey of track set frequency throughout the Bangladesh Sundarbans to aid formulation of a management-driven monitoring program. Three teams of two observers surveyed a total of 1201 km of waterways throughout the Sundarbans, recording 1338 tiger track sets. These sets became unrecognizable as tiger sign after a mean 10 days (range 614). Proportion of detectable sign recorded was 0.91. Mean (+/- standard error) sample unit track frequency was 1.12 +/- 0.86 track sets/km of khal. The mean coefficient of variance in sample unit track rate, estimated by multiple counts of six sample units, was 0.21 (range 0.06-0.34). Track frequency generally increased from northeast to southwest. Four sample units (6%) had signs of reproduction, with a mean litter size of 1.75 +/- 0.5. Monte Carlo simulation suggests a monitoring program of one complete survey every two years will have power of 0.8 (alpha = 0.2), to detect track frequency declines of >= 19% and increases of >= 17%. We recommend this monitoring scheme be implemented on the Indian side of the Sundarbans to provide a standard assessment of the tiger population and to form the basis for setting management objectives and evaluating transboundary conservation initiatives. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available