4.6 Article

Functional roles of the two domains of phosducin and phosducin-like protein

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 275, Issue 39, Pages 30399-30407

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M005120200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY06062, EY12287] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosducin and phosducin-like protein regulate G protein signaling pathways by binding the beta gamma subunit complex (G beta gamma) and blocking G beta gamma association with G alpha subunits, effector enzymes, or membranes. Both proteins are composed of two structurally independent domains, each constituting approximately half of the molecule. We investigated the functional roles of the two domains of phosducin and phosducin-like protein in binding retinal G(t)beta gamma. Kinetic measurements using surface plasmon resonance showed that: 1) phosducin bound G(t)beta gamma with a 2.5-fold greater affinity than phosducin-like protein; 2) phosphorylation of phosducin decreased its affinity by 3-fold, principally as a result of a decrease in k(1); and 3) most of the free energy of binding comes from the N-terminal domain with a lesser contribution from the C-terminal domain. In assays measuring the association of G(t)beta gamma with G(t)alpha and light-activated rhodopsin, both N-terminal domains inhibited binding while neither of the C-terminal domains had any effect. In assays measuring membrane binding of G(t)beta gamma, both the N- and C-terminal domains inhibited membrane association, but much less effectively than the fall-length proteins. This inhibition could only be described by models that included a change in G(t)beta gamma to a conformation that did not bind the membrane. These models yielded a free energy change of +1.5 +/- 0.25 kcal/moI for the transition from the G(t)alpha-binding to the Pd-binding conformation of G(t)beta gamma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available