4.3 Article

Circadian rhythm changes in core temperature over the menstrual cycle: method for noninvasive monitoring

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.4.R1316

Keywords

ovulation; cosinor analysis; body temperature regulation; temperature telemetry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to determine whether core temperature (T-c) telemetry could be used in ambulatory women to track changes in the circadian T-c rhythm during different phases of the menstrual cycle and, more specifically, to detect impending ovulation. T-c was measured in four women who ingested a series of disposable temperature sensors. Data were collected each minute for 2-7 days and analyzed in 36-h segments by automated cosinor analysis to determine the mesor (mean temperature), amplitude, period, acrophase (time of peak temperature), and predicted circadian minimum core temperature (Tc-min) for each cycle. The T-c mesor was higher (P less than or equal to 0.001) in the luteal (L) phase (37.39 +/- 0.13 degrees C) and lower in the preovulatory (P) phase (36.91 +/- 0.11 degrees C) compared with the follicular (F) phase (37.08 +/- 0.13 degrees C). The predicted Tc-min was also greater in L (37.06 +/- 0.14 degrees C) than in menses (M; 36.69 +/- 0.13 degrees C), F (36.6 +/- 0.16 degrees C), and P (36.38 +/- 0.08 degrees C) (P less than or equal to 0.0001). During P, the predicted Tc-min was significantly decreased compared with M and F (P less than or equal to 0.0001). The amplitude of the T-c rhythm was significantly reduced in L compared with all other phases (P less than or equal to 0.005). Neither the period nor acrophase was affected by menstrual cycle phase in ambulatory subjects. The use of an ingestible temperature sensor in conjunction with fast and accurate cosinor analysis provides a noninvasive method to mark menstrual phases, including the critical preovulatory period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available