4.6 Article

Structural synaptic modifications associated with hippocampal LTP and behavioral learning

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 952-962

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.10.952

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [1 RO1 AG17139] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [5 RO1 NS34582] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An important problem in the neurobiology of memory is whether cellular mechanisms of learning and memory include the formation of new synapses or the remodeling of existing ones. To elucidate this problem, numerous studies have examined alterations in the number and structure of synapses following behavioral learning and hippocampal lone-term potentiation (LTP), which is viewed as a synaptic model of memory The data reported in the literature and obtained in this laboratory are analyzed here to evaluate what kind of structural modification is likely to account for synaptic plasticity associated with learning and memory. It has been demonstrated that LTP induction elicits the formation of additional synapses between activated axon terminals and newly emerging dendritic spines. Similarly, some forms of learning have been shown to increase the number of synapses. Although many ultrastructural studies examining the effect of LTP or learning failed to find a change in total synapse number, this population measure might not detect an increase in a small proportion of synapses established by activated terminals. LTP and learning have also been shown to induce a remodeling of synapses. This process is proposed to involve the transformation of certain synaptic subtypes into more efficacious ones, including the conversion of 'silent' synapses into functional synapses. It appears, therefore, that cellular mechanisms of learning and memory are likely to include both synaptogenesis and synapse remodeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available