4.3 Article

Calcium carbonate precipitation by ureolytic subsurface bacteria

Journal

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 305-318

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/782198884

Keywords

calcite; carbonate; microorganism; remediation; subsurface; urease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coprecipitation in carbonate minerals offers a means of slowing the transport of divalent radionuclides and contaminant metals (e.g., Sr-90(2+), UO22+, Co2+) in the subsurface. It may be possible to accelerate this process by stimulating the native microbial community to generate chemical conditions favoring carbonate precipitation. In a preliminary evaluation of this approach, we investigated the ability of ureolytic subsurface bacteria to produce alkaline conditions conducive to calcium carbonate precipitation. Groundwater samples from the Eastern Snake River Plain (ESRP) aquifer in Idaho were screened for urea-hydrolyzing microorganisms; three isolates were selected for further evaluation. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that two of the ESRP isolates were of the genus Pseudomonas, and the other was a Variovorax sp. The specific urease activities of the ESRP isolates appeared to be similar to each other but less than that of Bacillus pasteurii, a known urease-positive organism. However, calcium carbonate was rapidly precipitated in all cultures that were supplied with urea and calcium, and X-ray diffraction analyses indicated that calcite was always the predominant carbonate polymorph produced. The correspondence between measured calcium concentrations and equilibrium predictions suggested that the rate of calcite precipitation was directly linked to the rate of urea hydrolysis. These results are promising with respect to the potential utility of this approach for in situ remediation and indicate that further evaluation of this approach under conditions more closely simulating environmental conditions is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available