4.1 Article

Social Status-Related Differences in Motor Activity Between Wild-Type and Mutant Zebrafish

Journal

BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN
Volume 235, Issue 2, Pages 71-82

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/699514

Keywords

M-cells; Mauthner neurons; ROI; region of interest; TLN; Tupfel long-fin nacre; WT; wild type

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1754513]
  2. East Carolina University Division of Research fund
  3. East Carolina University Interdisciplinary Research Award [591211]
  4. East Carolina University Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity Award [591230]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1754513] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Use of zebrafish as a model organism in biomedical research has led to the generation of many genetically modified mutant lines to investigate various aspects of developmental and cellular processes. However, the broader effects of the underlying mutations on social and motor behavior remain poorly examined. Here, we compared the dynamics of social interactions in the Tupfel long-fin nacre mutant line, which lacks skin pigmentation, to wild-type zebrafish; and we determined whether status-dependent differences in escape and swimming behavior existed within each strain. We show that despite similarities in aggressive activity, Tupfel long-fin nacre pairs exhibit unstable social relationships characterized by frequent reversals in social dominance compared to wild-type pairs. The lack of strong dominance relationships in Tupfel long-fin nacre pairs correlates with weak territoriality and overlapping spatial distribution of dominants and subordinates. Conversely, wild-type dominants displayed strong territoriality that severely limited the movement of subordinates. Additionally, the sensitivity of the startle escape response was significantly higher in wild-type subordinates compared to dominants. However, status-related differences in sensitivity of escape response in Tupfel long-fin nacre pairs were absent. Finally, we present evidence suggesting that these differences could be a consequence of a disruption of proper visual social signals. We show that in wild-type pairs dominants are more conspicuous, and that in wild-type and Tupfel long-fin nacre pairings wild-type fish are more likely to dominate Tupfel long-fin nacres. Our results serve as a cautionary note in research design when morphologically engineered zebrafish for color differences are utilized in the study of social behavior and central nervous system function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available