4.1 Article

Francisella philomiragia Biofilm Formation and Interaction With the Aquatic Protist Acanthamoeba castellanii

Journal

BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN
Volume 219, Issue 2, Pages 178-188

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/BBLv219n2p178

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [GK-12]
  2. Fred Karush Endowed Library
  3. Virginia Academy of Science
  4. DOE [DE-F C52-04NA25455]
  5. Commonwealth of Virginia Educational Trust Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bacterium Francisella philomiragia has been isolated from environmental samples originating from around the globe. F. philomiragia-related strains cause francisellosis of both farmed and wild fish. In addition, occasional human infections caused by F. philomiragia are found in victims of near-drowning and patients with chronic granulomatous disease. We have shown that F. philomiragia forms in vitro biofilms with increased formation at 25 degrees C over 37 degrees C conditions. We found that F. philomiragia can form a biofilm in a co-culture with live Acanthamoeba castellanii, an aquatic amoeba. Interestingly, amoeba-conditioned supernatant has an inhibitory effect on production of biofilm by F. philomiragia, whereas Francisella-conditioned supernatant has no effect on growth of amoebae. We have shown that F. philomiragia can infect A. castellanii after only 5 days of co-incubation and that it infects A. castellanii more quickly than the related species F. novicida does. Our studies point to a potentially overlooked interaction between F. philomiragia and Acanthamoeba. This relationship in the marine lifecycle of F. philomiragia may support the persistence of the bacterium in waterways and its ability to infect fish. An understanding of the persistence of this organism in aquatic systems through biofilm formation and its interaction with Acanthamoeba will be important in developing prevention strategies for this pathogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available