4.3 Article

A Rat Model for Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Induced by Cigarette Smoke Inhalation and Repetitive Bacterial Infection

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 1752-1760

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b12-00407

Keywords

pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive; animal model; pulmonary function; histological change; right ventricular hypertrophy index

Funding

  1. China State Natural Science Funds Commission [30973743, 81130062, 81173236]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To develop a stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) model in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with cigarette-smoke inhalation (CSI) for 12 weeks, repetitive bacterial infection (RBI) for 8 weeks, or the combination of the two (CCR) for 12 weeks and followed up for the additional 20 weeks. Tidal volume (V-T), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and 50% V-T expiratory flow (EF50), histological changes in the lungs, and levels of the cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-8, and IL-10 in serum and bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were examined at intervals during the 32 week study period. The right ventricular hypertrophy index (RVHI) was also determined at the same times. V-T, PEF, and EF50 were decreased in rats with COPD compared to the control. The expression of TNF-alpha, IL-8 and IL-10 increased in both serum and BALE with a similar trend. Bronchiole and arteriole wall thickness and the degree of bronchiole stenosis and alveolar size increased in COPD rats. RVHI was reduced gradually following the treatment. All of these changes were more pronounced in the CCR-treatment group than in the other groups. Our results have shown that CSI or RBI alone can induce COPD in rats, but that the combination of CSI with RBI induces a stable COPD that has more similarity to complications seen in patients with COPD. This combination may therefore provide a more appropriate model for study of human COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available