4.3 Article

Butein from Rhus verniciflua Protects Pancreatic beta Cells against Cytokine-Induced Toxicity Mediated by Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Formation

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 97-102

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.34.97

Keywords

butein; Rhus verniciflua; pancreatic beta-cell; cytokine; nuclear factor-kappa B; glucose-stimulated insulin secretion

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2010-0029467]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Butein (3,4,2',4'-tetrahydroxychalcone), a plant polyphenol, is a major component in isolate of Rhus verniciflua STOKES (Anacardiaceae). It is shown to exert various potent effects such as antioxidant, antiinflammatory induction of apoptosis among many properties. In this study, we investigated the effect of butein on cytokine-induced beta-cell damage. Pre-treatment with butein is shown to increase the viability of cytokine-treated INS-1 cells at concentrations of 15-30 mu M. Butein prevented cytokine-mediated cell death, as well as nitric oxide (NO) production, and these effects correlated well with reduced levels of protein expression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms by which butein inhibits iNOS gene expression appeared to be through the inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) translocation. In a second set of experiments, rat islets were used to demonstrate the protective effects of butein and the results were essentially the same as those observed in Beutin pretreated INS-1 cells. Butein prevented cytokine-induced NO production, iNOS expression, and NF-kappa B translocation and inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). In conclusion, these results suggest that butein can be used for the prevention of functional beta-cell damage and preventing the progression of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available