Journal
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 25-33Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00165-8
Keywords
wetland value; marginal value; watershed management; landscape ecology; wetland economics
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Wetlands have value because their functions have proved to be useful to humans. The unit value for some wetlands also increases with human development (agriculture and urban) because of increased use and/or increased scarcity. Yet, paradoxically, its functions can easily be overwhelmed in areas of heavy human development, thus lessening those values. Thus wetlands appear to work best in the landscape as spatially distributed systems. Also, the value is partially dependent on where they are found in the landscape, e.g., the degree to which a wetland is open to hydrologic and biological fluxes with other systems, including urban and agricultural landscapes. A paradox of assigning values to wetlands and other ecosystems is that it can argue for the replacement of one system with another if a landscape view is not taken. Estimates of percent of landscape for various functions, e.g. water quality or flood control, are presented. It is suggested that a range of 3-7% of temperate-zone watersheds should be in wetlands to provide adequate flood control and water quality values for the landscape. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available