4.5 Article

Helical CT scanning: The primary imaging modality for acute flank pain

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 649-652

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/ajem.2000.16292

Keywords

calculi; computed tomography; renal colic; obstruction; pain; kidney; ureter; bladder

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We set out to evaluate the accuracy of nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) scanning at stone detection in the patient with acute flank pain, and as a means of detecting noncalculus causes of acute flank pain. Between April 1995 and April 1997, 412 consecutive patients with acute flank pain underwent noncontrast-enhanced helical CT. Two hundred eighty-one patients had confirmation of their CT diagnosis by other radiographic studies, urologic intervention, or spontaneous stone passage of calculi, We determined the presence or absence of urinary calculi, as well as the presence of other noncalculus pathology. CT scanning revealed a stone in 92/281 patients (32.%) and no stone in 189/81 patients (67.%), Of the 189 patients, 60/89 patients (32%) had another positive finding as a cause for flank pain. Eighty one of 92 patients with a stone on CT (88%) had confirmation of stone disease by radiologic or surgical intervention. Eleven of 92 patients (12%) did not have confirmation of their diagnosis because of resolution of symptoms or refusal of further intervention, On helical CT scans 129/189 patients demonstrated no abnormalities. Two of 189 (1.5%) thought to be stone free by CT passed a stone. Helical CT had a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 88%, and a negative predictive value of 98% at stone detection. Noncontrast-enhanced helical CT is accurate and rapid in detecting calculus disease in patients with acute flank pain. Perhaps more importantly, it provides the added benefit of detecting noncalculus causes of flank pain in greater than 30% of patients. (Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:649-652, Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available