4.3 Review

Oligovascular Signaling in White Matter Stroke

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1639-1644

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.32.1639

Keywords

oligovascular signaling; white matter injury; stroke; oligovascular niche; oligodendrocyte; neurovascular unit

Funding

  1. Deane Foundation
  2. American Heart Association
  3. NIH [R37-NS37074, R01-NS48422, R01-NS53560, P50-NS10828, P01-NS55104]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P01NS055104, R01NS053560, RC2NS069335, R01NS048422, R37NS037074, P50NS010828] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability in developed countries. Since protecting neurons alone is not sufficient for stroke therapy, research has shifted to the rescue of multiple cell types in the brain. In particular, attention has focused on the study of how cerebral blood vessels and brain cells communicate with each other. Recent findings suggest that cerebral endothelial cells may secrete trophic factors that nourish neighboring cells. Although data are strongest in terms of supporting endothelial-neuronal interactions, it is likely that similar interactions occur in white matter as well. In this mini-review, we summarize recent advances in the dissection of cell-cell interactions in white matter. We examine two key concepts. First, trophic interactions between vessels and oligodendrocytes (OLGs) and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) play critical roles in white matter homeostasis. Second, cell-cell trophic coupling is disturbed under diseased conditions that incur oxidative stress. White matter pathophysiology is very important in stroke. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms of oligovascular signaling in normal and pathologic conditions may lead us to new therapeutic targets for stroke and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available