4.7 Article

Forsterite surface composition in aqueous solutions: A combined potentiometric, electrokinetic, and spectroscopic approach

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 64, Issue 19, Pages 3299-3312

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00435-X

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surfaces of natural and synthetic forsterite (Fo(91) and Fo(100)) in aqueous solutions at 25 degrees C were investigated using surface titrations in batch and limited residence time reactors, column filtration experiments, electrokinetic measurements (streaming potential and electrophoresis techniques), Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Spectroscopy (DRIFT), and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). At pH < 9, a Mg-depleted, Si-rich layer (<20 Angstrom thick) is formed on the forsterite surface due to a Mg2+ <----> H+ exchange reaction. Electrokinetic measurements yield a pH(IEP) value of 4.5 corresponding to the dominance of SiO2 in the surface layer at pH < 9. In contrast, surface titrations of fresh powders give an apparent pH(PZC) of about 10 with the development of a large positive charge (up to 10(-4) mol/m(2) or 10 C/m(2)) in the acid pH region. This may be explained by penetration of H+ into the first unit cells of forsterite surface. The surface charge of acid-reacted forsterite is one or two orders of magnitude lower than that of unreacted forsterite with an apparent pH(PZC) at around 6.5 and a pH(IEP) value of 2.1 which is close to that for amorphous silica and reflects the formation of a silica-rich layer on the surface. XPS analyses indicate the penetration of hydrogen into the surface and the polymerization of silica tetrahedra in this leached layer. At pH > 10, a Si-deficient, Mg-rich surface layer is formed as shown by XPS analyses and the preferential Si release from the surface during column filtration experiments. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available