4.6 Article

Putative immunodominant human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD8+ T-Cell responses cannot be predicted by major histocompatibility complex class I haplotype

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 19, Pages 9144-9151

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.74.19.9144-9151.2000

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R37 AI035522, AI35522, R01 AI035522, AI47603, R01 AI047603] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8(+) T cells have focused on responses to single, usually HLA-A2-restricted epitopes as surrogate measures of the overall response to HIV. However, the assumption that a response to one epitope is representative of the total response is unconfirmed. Here we assess epitope immunodominance and HIV-specific CD8(+) T-cell response complexity using cytokine flow cytometry to examine CD8(+) T-cell responses in II HLA-A2(+) HIV+ individuals. Initial studies demonstrated that only 4 of 11 patients recognized the putative immunodominant HLA-A2-restricted p17 epitope SLYNT-VATL, suggesting that the remaining subjects might lack significant HIV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses. Hoc-ever, five of six SLYNTVALT, nonresponders recognized other HIV epitopes, and two of four SLYNTVATL responders had greater responses to HIV peptides restricted by other class I alleles, In several individuals, no HLA-A2-restricted epitopes were recognized, but CD8(+) T-cell responses were detected to epitopes restricted by other HLA class I alleles. These data indicate that an individual's overall CD8(+) T cell response to HIV is not adequately represented qv the response to a single epitope and that individual major histocompatibility complex class I alleles do not predict an immunodominant response restricted by that allele, Accurate quantification of total HIV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses Hill require assessment of the response to all possible epitopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available