4.6 Article

The Effect of 6 Versus 9 Years of Zoledronic Acid Treatment in Osteoporosis: A Randomized Second Extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT)

Journal

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 934-944

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2442

Keywords

RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS; FRACTURE PREVENTION; OSTEOPOROSIS; ANTIRESORPTIVES; BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF BONE TURNOVER

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Merck
  3. Lilly
  4. Amgen
  5. Radius
  6. Enteris
  7. Asahi-Kasei
  8. Medscape
  9. Omnia
  10. Servier
  11. Roche
  12. MSD
  13. Takeda
  14. Department of Health
  15. AstraZeneca
  16. Immunodiagnostic Systems
  17. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  18. National Osteoporosis Society
  19. ARUK/MRC Centre of Excellence in Musculoskeletal Ageing Research
  20. National Institute for Health Research
  21. Cancer Research UK
  22. MRC/AZMechanism of Diseases Call
  23. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust
  24. Procter Gamble
  25. Sanofi Aventis
  26. Queen Mary University of Landon
  27. Arthritis Research UK
  28. PRP Department of Health
  29. Alexion
  30. Otsuka
  31. IBMS
  32. Johnson Johnson
  33. SPD Development
  34. Fonterra Brands
  35. Janssen Research
  36. Lily
  37. Ono Pharma
  38. Alere (Unipath)
  39. Chronos
  40. European Calcified Tissue Society
  41. Efficacy & mechanism Evaluation Board of Medical Research Council
  42. IOF CSA
  43. MRC [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  44. Medical Research Council [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While bisphosphonates reduce fracture risk over 3 to 5 years, the optimal duration of treatment is uncertain. In a randomized extension study (E1) of the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT), zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5mg annually for 6 years showed maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD), decrease in morphometric vertebral fractures, and a modest reduction in bone turnover markers (BTMs) compared with discontinuation after 3 years. To investigate the longer-term efficacy and safety of ZOL, a second extension (E2) was conducted to 9 years in which women on ZOL for 6 years in E1 were randomized to either ZOL (Z9) or placebo (Z6P3) for 3 additional years. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, 190 women were randomized to Z9 (n=95) and Z6P3 (n=95). The primary endpoint was change in total hip BMD at year 9 vs. year 6 in Z9 compared with Z6P3. Other secondary endpoints included fractures, BTMs, and safety. From year 6 to 9, the mean change in total hip BMD was -0.54% in Z9 vs. -1.31% in Z6P3 (difference 0.78%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.37%, 1.93%; p=0.183). BTMs showed small, non-significant increases in those who discontinued after 6 years compared with those who continued for 9 years. The number of fractures was low and did not significantly differ by treatment. While generally safe, there was a small increase in cardiac arrhythmias (combined serious and non-serious) in the Z9 group but no significant imbalance in other safety parameters. The results suggest almost all patients who have received six annual ZOL infusions can stop medication for up to 3 years with apparent maintenance of benefits. (c) 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available