4.1 Article

Effect of a combined walking and conversation intervention on functional mobility of nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease

Journal

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 196-201

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002093-200010000-00002

Keywords

exercise; walking; conversation; Alzheimer disease; functional mobility; compliance

Funding

  1. NINR NIH HHS [R01 NR003322-04, R01-NR03322] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assisted walking and walking combined with conversation were compared to a conversation-only intervention in nursing home residents with Alzheimer disease. Sixty-five subjects randomly assigned to treatment group were tested at baseline and end of treatment. Subjects' mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 10.83; mean age was 87. Treatment was given for 30 minutes three times a week for 16 weeks. Subjects in the assisted walking group declined 20.9% in functional mobility; the conversation group declined 18.8%. The combined walking and conversation treatment group declined only 2.5%. These differences in outcome were significant and appear to have been affected by differences in treatment fidelity. Subjects in the conversation treatment group completed 90% of intended treatment compared with 75% in the combined group and only 57% in the assisted walking group. Failure to treat was due to subject refusal and physical illness. The conversation component of the combined walking and conversation treatment intervention appears to have improved compliance with the intervention, thereby improving treatment outcome. Results indicate that assisted walking with conversation can contribute to maintenance of functional mobility in institutionalized populations with Alzheimer disease. Staff assigned to this task should be prepared to use effective communication strategies to gain acceptance of the intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available