4.6 Article

Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus that does not express the NS1 or M2-2 protein is highly attenuated and immunogenic in chimpanzees

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 19, Pages 9317-9321

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.74.19.9317-9321.2000

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AI000099] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-000087] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutant recombinant respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV) which cannot express the NS1 and M2-2 proteins, designated rA2 Delta NS1 and rA2 Delta M2-2, respectively, were evaluated as live-attenuated RSV vaccines. The rA2 Delta NS1 virus contains a large deletion that should have the advantageous property of genetic stability during replication in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, rA2 Delta NS1 replicated approximately 10-fold less well than wild-type recombinant RSV (rA2), while rA2 Delta M2-2 had delayed growth kinetics but reached a final titer similar to that of rA2. Each virus was administered to the respiratory tracts of RSV-seronegative chimpanzees to assess replication, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy. The rA2 Delta NS1 and rA2 Delta M2-2 viruses were 2,200- to 55,000-fold restricted in replication in the upper and lower respiratory tracts but induced a level of RSV-neutralizing antibody in serum that was only slightly reduced compared to the level induced by wild-type RSV. The replication of wild-type RSV in immunized chimpanzees after challenge was reduced more than 10,000 fold at each site. Importantly, rA2 Delta NS1 and rA2 Delta M2-2 were 10-fold more restricted in replication in the upper respiratory tract than was the cpts248/404 virus, a vaccine candidate that retained mild reactogenicity in the upper respiratory tracts of 1-month-old infants. Thus, either rA2 Delta NS1 or rA2 Delta M2-2 might be appropriately attenuated for this age group, which is the major target population for an RSV vaccine. In addition, these results show that neither NS1 nor M2-2 is essential for RSV replication in vivo, although each is important for efficient replication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available