4.6 Article

Fetal adrenal artery velocimetry measurements in appropriate-for-gestational age and intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 419-424

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00222.x

Keywords

adrenal circulation; Doppler ultrasound; fetal suprarenal gland; intrauterine growth retardation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate adrenal artery blood flow in the fetus. Design and method Sixty-two appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) and 20 intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) fetuses were recruited to this cross-sectional study between 22 and 42 weeks of pregnancy in a tertiary referral fetal medicine unit of a university hospital. Endpoints Doppler velocimetry of the fetal adrenal, umbilical (UA), renal and middle cerebral arteries (MCA). Pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), peak systolic velocity (PSV), time-averaged maximum velocity (TAMXV) and cerebroplacental ratio (MCA RI/UA RI; CPR). Obstetric outcome. Results The adrenal artery was detected in 82% of the fetuses. All flow velocity waveforms obtained from the adrenal artery indicated low impedance blood flow. No significant changes in PI, RI, PSV and TAMXV occurred with advancing gestation. The blood flow parameters of the adrenal artery did not differ between AGA and IUGR fetuses. In five IUGR fetuses with signs of redistribution of cardiac output in fatter of the brain, the adrenal artery velocimetry results were unremarkable. The adrenal artery PI, RI, PSV and TAMXV values were higher in female fetuses than in male fetuses (P < 0.05). A relationship was observed between the velocity measurements and the estimated fetal weight (P < 0.01). Conclusions The fetal adrenal artery could be readily detected. We observed no redistribution of blood flow in favor of the fetal adrenals in IUGR fetuses which were not severely compromised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available