4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Final intelligence in late treated patients with phenylketonuria

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages S145-S148

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/PL00014379

Keywords

intelligence; late treatment; modifier gene; phenylalanine hydroxylase; phenylketonuria

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite neonatal screening programmes, there is still a number of patients with phenylketonuria who are not diagnosed and start treatment late. The question in this study was to evaluate which factors will contribute, other than the quality and duration of dietary treatment, to final outcome in late treated patients with phenylketonuria. We retrospectively analysed the data of 40 patients with phenylketonuria, of whom 2 patients at 35 and 24 years of age had a normal IQ despite never being treated. In 38 patients starting dietary treatment between 0.7 and 7 years of age, mean IQ/DQ at diagnosis was 52.7 (SD = 16) (mean age 2.5 years), final IQ (mean age 33.5 years) was 79.0 (SD = 16), the difference was highly significant (P < 0.0001). Important factors for the final intelligence in adult late treated patients with phenylketonuria were onset (r = -0.46, P < 0.009) and DQ/IQ (r = 0.51, P < 0.002) when dietary treatment was started. Thus, in late treated patients with phenylketonuria, in addition to the quality and duration of treatment, the outcome is mainly influenced by the age of starting treatment and also by the intellectual status of the patient. In one of the two patients with normal intelligence, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy showed that brain phenylalanine was undetectable even though blood phenylalanine was 30 mg/dl. A second metabolic disorder may protect these patients from severe brain damage. Conclusion These data indicate that brain damage in untreated or late treated patients with phenylketonuria is influenced by various genetic factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available