4.7 Article

Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment?

Journal

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 7, Pages 1019-1030

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00011-3

Keywords

self-rated health; social class; work environment; life style; prospective study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the present paper is to describe differences in work environment and life style factors between social classes in Denmark and to investigate to what extent these factors can explain social class differences with regard to changes in self-rated health (SRH) over a 5 year period. We used data from a prospective study of a random sample of 5001 Danish employees, 18-59 years of age, interviewed at baseline in 1990 and again in 1995. At baseline we found higher prevalence in the lower classes of repetitive work, low skill discretion, low influence at work, high job insecurity, and ergonomic, physical, chemical, and climatic exposures. High psychological demands and conflicts at work were more prevalent in the higher classes. With regard to life style factors, we found more obese people and more smokers among the lower classes. The proportion with poor SRH increased with decreasing social class at baseline. The follow-up analyses showed a clear association between social class and worsening of SRH: The lower the social class, the higher the proportion with deterioration of SRH. There was no social gradient with regard to improved SRI-I over time. Approximately two thirds of the social gradient with regard to worsening of SRI-I could be explained by the work environment and life style factors. The largest contribution came from the work environment factors. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available