4.8 Article

Genetic characterization of rebounding HIV-1 after cessation of highly active antiretroviral therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 106, Issue 7, Pages 839-845

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI10565

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000102] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI046964, P30 AI042848, AI41534, AI42848, AI40387, U01 AI041534] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite prolonged treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), infectious HIV-1 continues to replicate and to reside latently in resting memory CD4(+) T lymphocytes, creating a major obstacle to HIV-1 eradication It is therefore not surprising to observe a prompt viral rebound after discontinuation of HAART. The nature of the rebounding virus, however, remains undefined. We now report on the genetic characterization of rebounding viruses in eight patients in whom plasma viremia was undetectable throughout about 3 years of HAART. Taking advantage of the extensive length polymorphism in HIV-1 env, we found that in five patients who did not show HIV-1 replication during treatment, the rebound virus was identical to those isolated from the latent reservoir. In three other patients, two of whom had been free of plasma viremia but had showed some residual viral replication, the rebound virus was genetically different from the latent reservoir virus, corresponding instead to minor viral variants detected during the course of treatment in lymphoid tissues. We conclude that in cases with apparent complete HIV-1 suppression by HAART, viral rebound after cessation of therapy could have originated from the activation of virus from the latent reservoir. In patients with incomplete suppression by chemotherapy, however, the viral rebound is likely triggered by ongoing, low-level replication of HIV-1, perhaps occurring in lymphoid tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available