4.7 Article

A survey of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in 4 ecotypes of Phragmites australis in northwest China:: Leaf anatomy, ultrastructure, and activities of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and glycollate oxidase

Journal

PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 201-208

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.110209.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four ecotypes of Phragmites australis from different habitats in northwest China were examined to compare their photosynthetic characteristics. In a swamp ecotype, the delta(13)C value of leaf materials was -34.0 parts per thousand, and bundle sheath cells contained a small amount of organelles and round-shaped chloroplasts, as being similar to typical C-3 plants. In a dune ecotype, the delta(13)C value was -20.9 parts per thousand and bundle sheath cells contained oval-shaped chloroplasts with poorly-developed grana, In light and heavy salt meadow ecotypes, delta(13)C values were -30.6 parts per thousand and -35.6 parts per thousand, respectively. The shape of bundle sheath chloroplasts in the light salt meadow ecotype was intermediate between those of the swamp and dune ecotypes, Abundance of bundle sheath organelles in the heavy salt meadow ecotype was intermediate. The swamp ecotype had photosynthetic enzyme activities typical of C-3 type plants, whereas the dune ecotype had an increased activity of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), a key C-4 enzyme, and a decreased ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) activity. The light salt meadow and heavy salt meadow ecotypes had substantial activities of PEPC, which indicates potential for C-4 photosynthesis. These data suggest that this species evolved the C-3-like ecotype in swamp environments and the C-4-like C-3-C-4 intermediate in dune desert environments, and C-3-like C-3-C-4 intermediates in salt environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available