4.7 Article

Role of Mg2+ in the interaction of anticancer antibiotic, chromomycin A3 with DNA:: Does neutral antibiotic bind DNA in absence of the metal ion?

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 209-218

Publisher

ADENINE PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2000.10506659

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antitumor antibiotic, Chromomycin A(3) (CHR), inhibits DNA replication and transcription Via reversible interaction with double stranded DNA with GC-base specificity. The interaction, at and above physiological pH, requires the presence of bivalent metal ions, such as Mg2+. Anionic antibiotic does not bind DNA in the absence of Mg2+. In this paper we have examined the structural potential of neutral CHR at pH 5.2 to bind DNA in the absence of Mg2+. We have demonstrated the ability of the neutral antibiotic to bind DNA by means of different spectroscopic techniques and evaluated the necessary thermodynamic parameters for elucidation of the molecular basis of recognition. The results are compared with the scenario when Mg2+ is present in the system, because the ultimate aim of these studies is to elucidate the role of Mg2+ in CHR-DNA recognition. Neutral CHR binds to Mg2+ with lesser affinity than its anionic form. Spectroscopic features of the drug and its Mg2+ complex indicate self association of the antibiotic in the absence and presence of Mg2+. GC-base specificity of the drug and its Mg2+ complex are retained at pH 5.2, though the modes of recognition of DNA by the two ligands are different. Minor groove width of DNA plays a role in the accommodation of the ligand(s) during the GC base specific recognition while positive charge of Mg2+ in CHR:Mg2+ complex further facilitates the association. Relatively lower affinity of the neutral drug and its Mg2+ complex for DNA can be ascribed to the self association of these ligands in the absence of DNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available