4.5 Article

Purification and characterization of cellulases produced by two Bacillus strains

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 177-187

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00305-9

Keywords

cellulase; Bacillus species; purification; properties; substrate specificity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellulases produced by two Bacillus strains, CH43 and HR68, isolated from hot springs in Zimbabwe, were purified to homogeneity from culture supernatants. Both enzymes had molecular mass of 40 kDa and isoelectric point of 5.4. The enzymes also resembled each other in N-terminal amino acid sequence which was Ala-Gly-Thr-Lys-Thr-Pro-Val-Ala-Lys-Asn-Gly-Gln, showing 100% homology with that of endoglucanases from Bacillus subtilis belonging to glycoside hydrolase family five. The cellulases were optimally active in the pH range of 5-6.5. The optimum temperature was 65 and 70 degrees C for the endoglucanase of CH43 and HR68, respectively. The CH43 enzyme was stable at 50 degrees C in a pH range of 6-10, and HR68 at pH 6-8. Both the enzymes retained complete activity for at least 24 h at 50 degrees C. The enzymes showed highest activity with beta-glucan as substrate followed by carboxymethylcellulose. Significant activity was also observed with crystalline forms of cellulose such as filter paper and Avicel, particularly for HR68 cellulase. For carboxymethycellulose, the CH43 and HR68 cellulases had a K-m of 1.5 and 1.7 mg ml(-1), respectively, and V-max of 0.93 and 1.70 mmol glucose min(-1) mg protein(-1), respectively. The activity of the enzymes was not influenced by most metal ions at 1 mM concentration, but was increased by about 38% by Co2+. The inhibition by Hg2+ and Mn2+ was higher for CH43 than for HR68 enzyme. Ag+ inhibited the CH43 activity but stimulated the HR68 activity. The CH43 cellulase was inhibited by N-bromosuccinimide and iodoacetamide while HR68 was unaffected. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available