Journal
LANCET
Volume 356, Issue 9238, Pages 1339-1343Publisher
LANCET LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02826-9
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Adverse reactions are a potential concern for physicians when they prescribe or recommend drugs. Epidemiological principles, when combined with clinical judgment, can be of help in this situation, starting with an appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of different sources of information on adverse reactions-clinical trials, case reports, and formal epidemiological studies. The latter studies generally provide the most comprehensive information on the risks of serious adverse drug reactions. An understanding of the different types of risk estimates, relative and absolute, is also needed-we stress the value of the absolute risk as the best measure of the impact of an adverse reaction. Rare serious reactions, although striking, have little impact on individual risk, whereas more common reactions, even with much lower fatality rates, are more likely to lead to adverse outcomes for patients. The importance of balancing risks and benefits, taking into account all the information about an individual patient's risk profile, is also highlighted.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available