4.8 Article

Capillary electrophoresis-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using a vacuum deposition interface

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 72, Issue 20, Pages 4785-4795

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac0005870

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [HG02033] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An improved vacuum deposition interface for coupling capillary electrophoresis with MALDI-TOF MS has been developed. Liquid samples consisting of analyte and matrix were deposited on a moving tape in the evacuated source chamber of a TOF mass spectrometer, enabling 24 h of uninterrupted analysis. The vacuum deposition procedure was compared with the dried-droplet method, and it was found that vacuum deposition generated significantly more reproducible signal intensity, eliminating the need for sweet spot searching. A concentration detection limit in the low-nanomolar range has been achieved with a low-attomole amount of sample consumed per spectrum. In addition, ion suppression caused by hydrophobicity differences in the analytes was reduced. To minimize ion suppression further, separation prior to MALDI MS analysis was employed. The performance of capillary electrophoresis (CE)-MALDI-TOF MS using the vacuum deposition interface was evaluated with a peptide mixture injected at low-femtomole levels. All peptides were baseline resolved with separation efficiencies in the range of 250 000-400 000 plates/m (2-3-s band half-width), demonstrating the high separation efficiency of the CE-MALDI MS coupling. A fast (similar to 40 s) CE separation of a mixture of angiotensins was found to reduce significantly ion suppression and enable trace level detection. It was also shown, for the analysis of an enolase digest, that sequence coverage of 65% was obtained using CE separation compared to 52% using step-elution solid-phase extraction and 44% in the control experiment using an unseparated mixture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available