4.6 Article

Distinct polyphosphoinositide binding selectivities for pleckstrin homology domains of GRP1-like proteins based on diglycine versus triglycine motifs

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 275, Issue 42, Pages 32816-32821

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M002435200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK30648] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GRP1 and the related proteins ARNO and cytohesin-1 are ARF exchange factors that contain a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain thought to target these proteins to cell membranes through binding polyphosphoinositides, Here we show the PH domains of all three proteins exhibit relatively high affinity for dioctanoyl phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3), with K-D values of 0.05, 1.6 and 1.0 muM for GRP1, ARNO, and cytohesin-1, respectively. However, the GRP1 PH domain was unique among these proteins in its striking selectivity for PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3 versus phosphatidylinositol 4,5-diphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P-2), for which it exhibits about 650-fold lower apparent affinity. Addition of a glycine to the Gly(274)-Gly(275) motif in GRP1 greatly increased its binding affinity for PtdIns(4,5)P-2 with little effect on its binding to PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3, while deletion of a single glycine in the corresponding triglycine motif of the ARNO PH domain markedly reduced its binding affinity for PtdIns(4,5)P-2 but not for PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3. In intact cells, the hemagglutinin epitope-tagged PH domain of GRP1 was recruited to ruffles in the cell surface in response to insulin, as were full-length GRP1 and cytohesin-1, but the PH domain of cytohesin-1 was not. These data indicate that the unique diglycine motif in the GRP1 PH domain, as opposed to the triglycine in ARNO and cytohesin-1, directs its remarkable PtdIns(3,4,5)P-3 binding selectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available