4.7 Article

Socrates: identification of genomic rearrangements in tumour genomes by re-aligning soft clipped reads

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1064-1072

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt767

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [637357]
  2. Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  3. Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS
  4. Melbourne Melanoma Project
  5. Victorian Cancer Biobank
  6. Victorian Cancer Agency
  7. Cancer Council of Victoria scholarship
  8. NICTA
  9. Australian Government
  10. Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy
  11. Australian Research Council through the ICT Centre of Excellence program
  12. NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship
  13. Cancer Council Victoria
  14. Leukaemia Foundation of Australia
  15. Pfizer Australia
  16. VESKI
  17. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship [1003856]
  18. Lorenzo and Pamela Galli Melanoma Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: Methods for detecting somatic genome rearrangements in tumours using next-generation sequencing are vital in cancer genomics. Available algorithms use one or more sources of evidence, such as read depth, paired-end reads or split reads to predict structural variants. However, the problem remains challenging due to the significant computational burden and high false-positive or falsenegative rates. Results: In this article, we present Socrates (SOft Clip re-alignment To idEntify Structural variants), a highly efficient and effective method for detecting genomic rearrangements in tumours that uses only splitread data. Socrates has single-nucleotide resolution, identifies micro-homologies and untemplated sequence at break points, has high sensitivity and high specificity and takes advantage of parallelism for efficient use of resources. We demonstrate using simulated and real data that Socrates performs well compared with a number of existing structural variant detection tools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available