4.6 Article

Inhibitory serpins from wheat grain with reactive centers resembling glutamine-rich repeats of prolamin storage proteins - Cloning and characterization of five major molecular forms

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 275, Issue 43, Pages 33272-33279

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M004633200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genes encoding proteins of the serpin superfamily are widespread in the plant kingdom, but the properties of very few plant serpins have been studied, and physiological functions have not been elucidated. Six distinct set-pins have been identified in grains of hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by partial purification and amino acid sequencing. The reactive centers of all but one of the serpins resemble the glutamine-rich repetitive sequences in prolamin storage proteins of wheat grain. Five of the serpins, classified into two protein Z subfamilies, WSZ1 and WSZ2, have been cloned, expressed in Escherichia coli, and purified. Inhibitory specificity toward 17 proteinases of mammalian, plant, and microbial origin was studied. All five serpins were suicide substrate inhibitors of chymotrypsin and cathepsin G. WSZ1a and WSZ1b inhibited at the unusual reactive center P-1-P-1' Gln-Gln, and WSZ2b at P-2-P-1 Leu-Arg-one of two overlapping reactive centers. WSZ1c with P-1-P-1' Leu-Gln was the fastest inhibitor of chymotrypsin (k(a) = 1.3 x 10(6) M-1 s(-1)). WSZ1a was as efficient an inhibitor of chymotrypsin as WSZ2a (k(a) similar to 10(5) M-1 s(-1)), which has P-1-P-1' Leu-Ser-a reactive center common in animal serpins. WSZ2b inhibited plasmin at P-1-P-1' Arg-Gln (k(a) similar to 10(3) M-1 s(-1)). None of the five serpins inhibited Bacillus subtilisin A, Fusarium trypsin, or two subtilisin-like plant serine proteinases, hordolisin from barley green malt and cucumisin D from honeydew melon. Possible functions involving interactions with endogenous or exogenous proteinases adapted to prolamin degradation are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available