Journal
ORGANOMETALLICS
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages 4468-4476Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om000340t
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The Ru-II complexes [RuCl(R-PCP)(PPh3)] (R-PCP = [C6H3{CH(Me)PPh2}(2)-2,6](-) (7a), [C6H3{CH(Et)PPh2}(2)-2,6](-) (7b), or [C6H2{CH2PPh2}(2)-2,6-SiMe3-4](-) (9)) were synthesized using distinct synthetic routes. One of these routes consists of the reaction of the parent arene compound R-PCHP (i.e., C6H4{CH(Me)PPh2}(2)-1,3 (6a), C6H4{CH(Et)PPh2}(2)-1,3 (6b), or C6H3(CH2PPh2)(2)-2,6-SiMe3-4 (8)) with [RuCl2(PPh3)(3)] in 1,2-dichloroethane. Following this procedure, complexes 7a and 7b were obtained. However, desilylation of 8 was observed with concomitant formation of complex [RuCl(C6H3{CH2PPh2}(2)-2,6)(PPh3)] (4). A second synthetic approach has been developed and applied in the high-yield synthesis of complexes 7a, 7b, and 9. This method, a transcyclometalation (TCM) reaction, involves the interconversion of one cyclometalated ligand metal complex, M(C,E), into another complex M(C,E') with the concomitant consumption and formation of the corresponding arenas HC,E' and HC,E, respectively. Using this method, previously observed problems such as nontolerance to the presence of a SiMe3 group, contamination of the final product by uncoordinated PPh3, or the formation of paramagnetic impurities were overcome. Investigations in solution of the formation of these square-pyramidal Ru complexes using two-dimensional NMR techniques (H-1-H-1 COSY and P-31-H-1 COSY) have shown that both synthetic routes were stereoselective, yielding only three of the four expected stereoisomers of complexes 7a and 7b.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available