4.6 Article

Evolutionary implications of the mosaic pyrimidine-biosynthetic pathway in eukaryotes

Journal

GENE
Volume 257, Issue 2, Pages 209-222

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00411-X

Keywords

amino acid sequence; enzyme; maximum likelihood method; molecular evolution; phylogenetic analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The de-novo pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway involves six enzymes, in order from the first to the sixth step, carbamoylphosphate synthetase II (CPS II) comprising glutamine amidotransferase (GAT) and carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase (CPS) domains or subunits, aspartate carbamoyltransferase (ACT), dihydroorotase (DHO), dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHOD), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), and orotidine-5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC). In contrast with reports on molecular evolution of the individual enzymes, we attempted to draw an evolutionary picture of the whole pathway using the protein phylogeny. We demonstrate highly mosaic organizations of the pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway in eukaryotes. During evolution of the eukaryotic pathway, plants and fungi (or their ancestors) in particular may have secondarily acquired the characteristic enzymes. This is consistent with the Wet that the organization of plant enzymes is highly chimeric: (1) two subunits of CPS II, GAT and CPS, cluster with a clade including cyanobacteria and red algal chloroplasts, (2) ACT not with a cyanobacterium, Synechocystis spp., irrespective of its putative signal sequence targeting into chloroplasts, and (3) DHO with a clade of proteobacteria. In fungi, DHO and OPRT duster respectively with the corresponding proteobacterial counterparts. The phylogenetic analyses of DHOD and OMPDC also support the implications of the mosaic pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway in eukaryotes. The potential importance of the horizontal gene transfer(s) and endosymbiosis in establishing the mosaic pathway is discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available