4.6 Article

The effect of an exogenous enzyme treatment on production and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing steers

Journal

ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 3-4, Pages 279-285

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00202-9

Keywords

enzyme; steers; growing; finishing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was conducted to determine the effect of an exogenous enzyme treatment on various production and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing steers. In the 84-day growing trial, 32 primarily British crossbred individually fed steers (259 kg BW) were randomly assigned control (C) or enzyme (E) treated diets (n = 16 for C and E). The diet contained 65:35 (DM basis) forage:concentrate. Steers on the enzyme treated diet received a total mixed, ration (TMR) that contained a solution with endoglucanase and xylanase activity at a rate of 5580 and 15,880 IU/kg of TMR DM, respectively. Average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI) and feed efficiency (FE) were not affected by treatment (P > 0.05), although FE showed a trend for improvement during the first 28 days for the enzyme treatment (P = 0.063). The finishing trial consisted of 20 individually fed steers (409 kg BW) randomly assigned treatment (n = 10 for C and E) in an 84-day trial. Steers on the enzyme treated diet received the same enzyme solution and level as in the growing trial. The finishing ration consisted of a 20:80 forage:concentrate ratio (DM basis). Results indicated no difference (P > 0.05) for ADG, DMI or FE as well as various carcass traits including hot carcass weight, ribeye area, backfat, yield, quality grade or cutability. It is concluded from these growing and finishing trials that the enzyme concentrate used did not affect production or carcass characteristics, but may be beneficial for improving feed efficiency when cattle are first placed on feed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available