4.7 Article

Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 1219-1231

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9297(07)62952-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01HG00376, T32 HG000040, R01 HG000376, T32HG00040] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Linkage analyses of genetic diseases and quantitative traits generally are performed using family data. These studies assume the relationships between individuals within families are known correctly. Misclassification of relationships can lead to reduced or inappropriately increased evidence for linkage. Boehnke and Cox (1997) presented a likelihood-based method to infer the most likely relationship of a pair of putative sibs. Here, we modify this method to consider all possible pairs of individuals in the sample, to test for additional relationships, to allow explicitly for genotyping error, and to include X-linked data. Using autosomal genome scan data, our method has excellent power to differentiate monozygotic twins, full sibs, parent-offspring pairs, second-degree (2 degrees) relatives, first cousins, and unrelated pairs but is unable to distinguish accurately among the 2 degrees relationships of half sibs, avuncular pairs, and grandparent-grandchild pairs. Inclusion of X-linked data improves our ability to distinguish certain types of 2 degrees relationships. Our method also models genotyping error successfully, to judge by the recovery of MZ twins and parent-offspring pairs that are otherwise misclassified when error exists. We have included these extensions in the latest version of our computer program RELPAIR and have applied the program to data from the Finland-United States Investigation of Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (FUSION) study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available