4.7 Article

Discriminative modelling of context-specific amino acid substitution probabilities

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 28, Issue 24, Pages 3240-3247

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts622

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB646, GRK1721]
  2. Bavarian Systems Biology Network (BaySysNet)
  3. Bavarian Ministry for Science, Research and Arts
  4. LMU through the Excellence Initiative of the BMBF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MOTIVATION: Protein sequence searching and alignment are fundamental tools of modern biology. Alignments are assessed using their similarity scores, essentially the sum of substitution matrix scores over all pairs of aligned amino acids. We previously proposed a generative probabilistic method that yields scores that take the sequence context around each aligned residue into account. This method showed drastically improved sensitivity and alignment quality compared with standard substitution matrix-based alignment. RESULTS: Here, we develop an alternative discriminative approach to predict sequence context-specific substitution scores. We applied our approach to compute context-specific sequence profiles for Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and compared the new tool (CS-BLASTdis) to BLAST and the previous context-specific version (CS-BLASTgen). On a dataset filtered to 20% maximum sequence identity, CS-BLASTdisis was 51% more sensitive than BLAST and 17% more sensitive than CS-BLASTgenin, detecting remote homologues at 10% false discovery rate. At 30% maximum sequence identity, its alignments contain 21 and 12% more correct residue pairs than those of BLAST and CS-BLASTgen, respectively. Clear improvements are also seen when the approach is combined with PSI-BLAST and HHblits. We believe the context-specific approach should replace substitution matrices wherever sensitivity and alignment quality are critical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available