4.7 Article

Reference-independent comparative metagenomics using cross-assembly: crAss

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 28, Issue 24, Pages 3225-3231

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts613

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF Division of Biological Infrastructure grant [0850356]
  2. Division of Environmental Biology grant [1046413]
  3. Dutch Science foundation (NWO) Veni grant [016.111.075]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1046413] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0850356] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1330800] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MOTIVATION: Metagenomes are often characterized by high levels of unknown sequences. Reads derived from known microorganisms can easily be identified and analyzed using fast homology search algorithms and a suitable reference database, but the unknown sequences are often ignored in further analyses, biasing conclusions. Nevertheless, it is possible to use more data in a comparative metagenomic analysis by creating a cross-assembly of all reads, i.e. a single assembly of reads from different samples. Comparative metagenomics studies the interrelationships between metagenomes from different samples. Using an assembly algorithm is a fast and intuitive way to link (partially) homologous reads without requiring a database of reference sequences. RESULTS: Here, we introduce crAss, a novel bioinformatic tool that enables fast simple analysis of cross-assembly files, yielding distances between all metagenomic sample pairs and an insightful image displaying the similarities. Availability and implementation: crAss is available as a web server at http://edwards.sdsu.edu/crass/, and the Perl source code can be downloaded to run as a stand-alone command line tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available