4.7 Article

Identifying differentially expressed transcripts from RNA-seq data with biological variation

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 28, Issue 13, Pages 1721-1728

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts260

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European ERASysBio+ initiative project SYNERGY by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I004769/2]
  2. Academy of Finland [135311, 121179]
  3. IST of the European Community under the PASCAL2 Network of Excellence [IST-2007-216886]
  4. BBSRC [BB/I004769/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I004769/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [135311, 121179, 135311, 121179] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: High-throughput sequencing enables expression analysis at the level of individual transcripts. The analysis of transcriptome expression levels and differential expression (DE) estimation requires a probabilistic approach to properly account for ambiguity caused by shared exons and finite read sampling as well as the intrinsic biological variance of transcript expression. Results: We present Bayesian inference of transcripts from sequencing data (BitSeq), a Bayesian approach for estimation of transcript expression level from RNA-seq experiments. Inferred relative expression is represented by Markov chain Monte Carlo samples from the posterior probability distribution of a generative model of the read data. We propose a novel method for DE analysis across replicates which propagates uncertainty from the sample-level model while modelling biological variance using an expression-level-dependent prior. We demonstrate the advantages of our method using simulated data as well as an RNA-seq dataset with technical and biological replication for both studied conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available