4.7 Article

A novel variational Bayes multiple locus Z-statistic for genome-wide association studies with Bayesian model averaging

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 28, Issue 13, Pages 1738-1744

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts261

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 HG005152, R01 HG006164, P01 CA53996, R01 CA90998]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [N01WH22110, 24152, 32100-2, 32105-6, 32108-9, 32111-13, 32115, 32118-32119, 32122, 4210726, 42129-32, 44221]
  5. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N02-HL-64278]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: For many complex traits, including height, the majority of variants identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have small effects, leaving a significant proportion of the heritable variation unexplained. Although many penalized multiple regression methodologies have been proposed to increase the power to detect associations for complex genetic architectures, they generally lack mechanisms for false-positive control and diagnostics for model over-fitting. Our methodology is the first penalized multiple regression approach that explicitly controls Type I error rates and provide model over-fitting diagnostics through a novel normally distributed statistic defined for every marker within the GWAS, based on results from a variational Bayes spike regression algorithm. Results: We compare the performance of our method to the lasso and single marker analysis on simulated data and demonstrate that our approach has superior performance in terms of power and Type I error control. In addition, using the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) SNP Health Association Resource (SHARe) GWAS of African-Americans, we show that our method has power to detect additional novel associations with body height. These findings replicate by reaching a stringent cutoff of marginal association in a larger cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available