4.7 Article

NARROMI: a noise and redundancy reduction technique improves accuracy of gene regulatory network inference

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 106-113

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts619

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CSC [20106050]
  2. NSFC [91029301, 61134013, 61072149, 91130032, 61103075, 31100949]
  3. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [13ZZ072]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program, Chief Scientist Program of SIBS from CAS [2009CSP002]
  5. Knowledge Innovation Program of SIBS of CAS [2011KIP203]
  6. Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS [KSCX2-EW-R-01]
  7. National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences of CAS
  8. FIRST Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: Reconstruction of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) is of utmost interest to biologists and is vital for understanding the complex regulatory mechanisms within the cell. Despite various methods developed for reconstruction of GRNs from gene expression profiles, they are notorious for high false positive rate owing to the noise inherited in the data, especially for the dataset with a large number of genes but a small number of samples. Results: In this work, we present a novel method, namely NARROMI, to improve the accuracy of GRN inference by combining ordinary differential equation-based recursive optimization (RO) and information theory-based mutual information (MI). In the proposed algorithm, the noisy regulations with low pairwise correlations are first removed by using MI, and the redundant regulations from indirect regulators are further excluded by RO to improve the accuracy of inferred GRNs. In particular, the RO step can help to determine regulatory directions without prior knowledge of regulators. The results on benchmark datasets from Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods challenge and experimentally determined GRN of Escherichia coli show that NARROMI significantly outperforms other popular methods in terms of false positive rates and accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available