3.8 Article

E-, N- and P-cadherin, and α-, β- and γ-catenin protein expression in normal, hyperplastic and carcinomatous human prostate

Journal

HISTOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 659-667

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004111331752

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The expression of E-, N- and P-cadherin, alpha-, beta- and gamma -catenin, and actin was studied by immunohistochemistry, ELISA, and Western blot analysis in normal prostates, and in the prostates of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and men with prostatic carcinoma, in order to evaluate their possible role in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Present results reveal that the immunophenotype of hyperplastic prostates differs from those of both normal and carcinomatous prostates in the intracellular distribution (observed by immunohistochemistry) and the intensity (measured by ELISA) of immunoreactions to cadherins, catenins, and actin. Hyperplastic prostates differ form normal prostates in the weaker immunoreaction to the three cadherin types, the two catenins, and actin, as well as in the intracellular distribution of P-cadherin, beta- and gamma -catenin, and actin. Differences between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma are less marked because hyperplastic prostates differ from carcinomatous prostates only in the weaker immunoreactions to P-cadherin, and alpha -catenin. The most remarkable findings in this study were: (1) alpha -catenin production was elevated in prostatic carcinoma in comparison with benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate; and (2) P-cadherin expression in benign prostatic hyperplasia is reduced with regard to those of normal and carcinomatous prostates. It may be concluded that a decreased immunoreaction to cadherins, catenins, and actin, as well as changes in the intracellular distribution of actin in prostatic cells are not necessarily suggestive of malignancy, because these alterations are also present in BPH, and thus, the loss of cadherin-catenin-mediated adhesion alone is not sufficient to establish an invasive phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available