4.7 Article

ISPyB: an information management system for synchrotron macromolecular crystallography

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages 3186-3192

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr535

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EU
  2. Integrated Programme 'Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources' [QLG2-CT-2002-00988]
  3. Biocrystallography (X) on a Highly Integrated Technology (BIOXHIT) Platform for European Structural Genomics [LSHG-CT-2003-503420]
  4. BBSRC/MRC
  5. BBSRC [e-HTPX]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivation: Individual research groups now analyze thousands of samples per year at synchrotron macromolecular crystallography (MX) resources. The efficient management of experimental data is thus essential if the best possible experiments are to be performed and the best possible data used in downstream processes in structure determination pipelines. Information System for Protein crystallography Beamlines (ISPyB), a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) with an underlying data model allowing for the integration of analyses down-stream of the data collection experiment was developed to facilitate such data management. Results: ISPyB is now a multisite, generic LIMS for synchrotron-based MX experiments. Its initial functionality has been enhanced to include improved sample tracking and reporting of experimental protocols, the direct ranking of the diffraction characteristics of individual samples and the archiving of raw data and results from ancillary experiments and post-experiment data processing protocols. This latter feature paves the way for ISPyB to play a central role in future macromolecular structure solution pipelines and validates the application of the approach used in ISPyB to other experimental techniques, such as biological solution Small Angle X-ray Scattering and spectroscopy, which have similar sample tracking and data handling requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available