4.5 Article

The perinatal advantage of Mexican origin Latina women

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 516-523

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00073-9

Keywords

birth certificates; California; infant low birth weight; infant mortality; pregnancy outcome; risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To determine if there is a perinatal advantage for birth outcomes among Mexican origin Latins (Latina) women compared to white non-Hispanic (white) women, after adjusting for maternal, paternal, and infant factors. METHODS: 1,439,583 births from the 1990-1993 California linked birth and infant death certificate data sets were analyzed for the risk of low birth weight infants and infant mortality. RESULTS: Latina women had a statistically higher unadjusted risk of low birth weight infants (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.07) and infant mortality (OR = 1.08) compared to white women. After adjusting for potential confounders, Latina women had a similar risk of low birth weight infants (OR = 0.98) and a lower risk of infant mortality (OR = 0.88) relative to white women. In multivariate analyses, the most significant risk factor for low infant birth weight was young gestational age (OR = 82.91 for gestational age 1-230 days and OR = 10.62 for gestational age 231-258 days) and the most significant risk factor for infant mortality was low birth weight (OR = 53.99 for infant birth weight <500 grams and OR = 9.27 for infant birth weight 500-2499 grams). CONCLUSION: There was some evidence of a perinatal advantage for Latina women, when compared to white women and after adjusting for numerous potential confounders. To further reduce the risk of low birth weight infants and infant mortality, additional research is needed for etiologic clues beyond race/ethnicity and other traditional risk factors. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available