Journal
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1068-1073Publisher
CANADIAN ANESTHESIOLOGISTS SOC
DOI: 10.1007/BF03027957
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: To determine A) what a labouring woman expects to hear about epidural analgesia before consenting, B) if she feels able to understand the risks and thereby assess if we are obtaining informed consent. Methods: Sixty actively labouring women were surveyed immediately after requesting an epidural, Demographic, labour, epidural and consent information were included in the questionnaire. Answers were categorical (yes/no, multiple choice) or scored on a scale from 0 to 10 (visual analogue scale). Results: The majority of parturients wanted all potential epidural complications but not their incidences disclosed in the consent process, However, a discussion of risks would not dissuade women from consenting to an epidural in the majority of cases. Labouring women have a moderate understanding of epidural risks, The ability to understand risks was not affected by labour pain, anxiety, opioid premedication, duration of labour pain, desire for an epidural, previous epidural experience, level of education or age. Conclusion: This prospective survey characterizes what 60 reasonable labouring women wanted to know about labour epidural analgesia. Parturients wanted all risks of epidural analgesia disclosed in the informed consent process. The majority of women did not want the incidences quoted. This study suggests that labouring patients are as able to give informed consent as are other members of our patient population.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available