4.7 Article

Abscisic acid and hypoxic induction of anoxia tolerance in roots of lettuce seedlings

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 51, Issue 352, Pages 1939-1944

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/51.352.1939

Keywords

abscisic acid; alcohol dehydrogenase; anoxia tolerance; ATP; Lactuca sativa

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings were subjected to anoxic stress after ABA-pretreatment (ABA-PT) or hypoxic-pretreatment (H-PT). The H-PT increased the survivability of the anoxia in roots of the seedlings by 5.2-fold compared to that of non-pretreated (N-PT) seedlings. ABA-PT also increased the survivability at concentrations greater than 1 muM, and the survivability increased with increasing ABA doses. At 100 muM ABA, the survivability was 4.5-fold greater than that of N-PT seedlings. During pretreatment periods, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH, EC 1.1.1.1) activity in the roots became 3.1- and 3.4-fold greater than that of N-PT seedlings following 100 muM ABA-PT and H-PT seedlings, respectively. After the onset of anoxic stress, ADH activities in all roots increased, but the activities-in H-PT and ABA-PT roots remained much greater than that in N-PT roots, and the average ethanol production rate for the initial 6 h was 5.3, 4.0 and 1.4 mu mol g(-1) FW h(-1) for H-PT, ABA-PT and N-PT roots, respectively. Roots of the seedlings lost ATP rapidly under anoxic stress; however, the decrease in ATP was much slower in the ABA-PT and H-PT seedlings than in the N-PT seedlings. These results suggest that the ABA-PT and H-PT may maintain ATP levels due to activation of ethanolic fermentation, which may be one of the causes of the increasing anoxia tolerance in the seedling roots. Measurement of endogenous ABA levels, however, showed that ABA levers did not increase during the H-PT, suggesting that the H-PT does not increase tolerance through an increase in ABA levers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available