4.7 Article

Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 217, Issue 2, Pages 377-384

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv36377

Keywords

brain, necrosis; brain neoplasms; brain neoplasms, MR; brain neoplasms, therapeutic radiology; radiations, injurious effects, complications of therapeutic radiology

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 55261] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To describe both the common and less frequently encountered magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced brain injury, with particular emphasis on radiation necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 148 adult patients underwent surgical resection of malignant brain (glial) tumors and were subsequently entered into a research protocol that consisted of accelerated radiation therapy with carboplatin followed by chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine. patients typically underwent sequential MR imaging at 6-8-week intervals during the 1st year and at 3-6-month intervals during subsequent years. in all patients, histopathologic confirmation of lesion composition was performed by board-certified neuropathologists. RESULTS: The patients exhibited different types of MR imaging-detected abnormalities of the brain: pure radiation necrosis in 20 patients, a mixture of predominantly radiation necrosis with limited recurrent and/or residual tumor (less than 20% of resected tissue) in 16 patients, radiation necrosis of the cranial nerves and/or their pathways in two patients, radiation-induced enhancement of the white matter in 52 patients, and radiation-induced enhancement of the cortex in nine patients. CONCLUSION: The frequent diagnostic dilemma of recurrent neoplasm Versus radiation necrosis is addressed in this study through a description of the varying spatial and temporal patterns of radiation necrosis at MR imaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available