4.7 Article

Local tumor recurrence following hepatic cryoablation: Radiologic-histopathologic correlation in a rabbit model

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 217, Issue 2, Pages 477-486

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv41477

Keywords

animals cryotherapy; liver, interventional procedures; liver, CT; liver, MR; liver, US; liver neoplasms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To use radiologic-histopathologic correlation in an animal model to distinguish normal postoperative findings from evidence of residual tumor after cryoablation of malignant hepatic tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hepatic cryoablation was performed in 12 rabbits with VX2 tumors and in two healthy rabbits. Nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and power and color Doppler flow ultrasonography (US) were performed 7-8 days after cryoablation. Histopathologic findings were correlated with imaging findings. RESULTS: Twenty tumors of 5-20 mm (mean, 10 mm) and seven areas of normal liver were treated with cryolesions of 11-21 mm (mean, 15 mm). All cryolesions exhibited arterial phase rim enhancement at Ci and MR imaging, and 13 (57%) of 23 lesions demonstrated peripheral flow at US because of granulation tissue. There was macroscopic recurrence in 15 (75%) of 20 treated tumors; 14 (93%) appeared as peripheral nodularity with low-grade enhancement. Necrotic tissue did not enhance. Intact vessels extended up to 6 mm inside cryolesion margins and caused focal internal enhancement and Doppler flow. Areas of high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images correlated with liquefaction necrosis, granulation tissue, and tumor. CONCLUSION: In this animal model, recurrent tumor typically appeared as focal nodules at the cryolesion periphery. Rim and central foci of enhancement, Doppler flow, and increased signal intensity on TZ-weighted MR images can be normal findings after hepatic cryoablation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available