4.6 Article

The role of cortical cholinergic afferent projections in cognition: impact of new selective immunotoxins

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 251-263

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00262-X

Keywords

acetylcholine; learning; memory; attention; 192 IgG-saporin

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG10 173] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS32 938, NS37 026] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous investigations aimed at determining the role of corticopetal cholinergic afferents in cognition have relied upon human psychopharmacological studies, neuropsychological analyses of Alzheimer's patients, or psychopharmacological manipulations and excitotoxic lesions in animals. Unfortunately, each approach has its limitations. The interpretation of neuropsychological data relies upon correlations of post-mortem assessments of cholinergic degeneration that may be quite temporally distant from the time of cognitive assessment. In contrast, the use of animals allows direct manipulations of the cholinergic system and the establishment of causal relationships between acetylcholine and cognitive function but is limited by the selectivity of the toxins and drugs available to manipulate the system. The recent introduction of immunotoxins to lesion cortical cholinergic pathways with greater selectivity has allowed the effective testing of these hypotheses of cholinergic functions in cognition. Previous neuropsychological, psychopharmacological and excitotoxic lesion data are reviewed and compared to results produced using the more selective immunotoxins to provide an update to the current hypotheses of the role of corticopetal cholinergic afferents in cognitive function. Additionally, the conceptual and methodological cost and benefits of the methods of infusion used to produce lesions with these immunotoxins is assessed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available