4.7 Article

The observed probability distribution function, power spectrum, and correlation function of the transmitted flux in the Lyα forest

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 543, Issue 1, Pages 1-23

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/317079

Keywords

cosmology : observations; intergalactic medium; large-scale structure of universe; quasars : absorption lines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sample of eight quasars observed at high resolution and signal-to-noise ratio is used to determine the transmitted flux probability distribution function (TFPDF), and the power spectrum and correlation function of the transmitted flux in the Ly alpha forest, in three redshift bins centered at z = 2.41, 3.00, and 3.89. All the results are presented in tabular form, with full error covariance matrices, to allow for comparisons with any numerical simulations and with other data sets. The observations are compared with a numerical simulation of the Lya forest of a ACDM model with Omega = 0.4, known to agree with other large-scale structure observational constraints. There is excellent agreement for the TFPDF if the mean transmitted flux is adjusted to match the observations. A small difference between the observed and predicted TFPDF is found at high fluxes and low redshift, which may be due to the uncertain effects of fitting the spectral continuum. Using the numerical simulation, we show how the flux power spectrum can be used to recover the initial power spectrum of density fluctuations. From our sample of eight quasars, we measure the amplitude of the mass power spectrum to correspond to a linear variance per unit Ink of Delta (2)(rho)(k)= 0.72 +/- 0.09 at k = 0.04(km s(-1))(-1) and z = 3, and the slope of the power spectrum near the same k to be n(p) = -2.55 +/- 0.10 (statistical error bars). The results are statistically consistent with those of Croft et al., although our value for the rms fluctuation is lower by a factor of 0.75. For the ACDM model we use, the implied primordial slope is n = 0.93 +/- 0.10, and the normalization is sigma (8) = 0.68 + 1.16(0.95 - n) +/- 0.04.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available