4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Microfabric study on the deformational and thermal history of the Alpi Apuane marbles (Carrara marbles), Italy

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 11-12, Pages 1809-1825

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8141(00)00086-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marbles from different geometrical and structural positions within the Alpi Apuane metamorphic complex show a large variability in microfabric types as indicated by microstructure, c-axis orientation and temperature analysis. Statically recrystallized samples showing a granoblastic microstructure and polygonal grain boundaries are characterized by a grain size variation from east to west from 80-100 mum to 250-300 mum This is correlated with an equilibration calcite-dolomite temperature from 360-380 degreesC to 420 degrees -430 degreesC. Two kinds of dynamically recrystallized microstructures have been investigated: a first one exhibiting coarse grains (150-200 mum) with lobate grain boundaries and a strong shape preferred orientation and a second one characterized by a smaller grain size (40-50 mum) and predominantly straight grain boundaries. These microstructural types, associated with localized post-thermal peak shear zones and meter- to kilometer-scale folds, are interpreted as related to high strain and high temperature crystal plastic deformation mechanisms (dislocation creep) associated with predominant grain boundary migration (type-B1) or subgrain-rotation recrystallization (type-B2). These differences in dynamically recrystallized microstructures are related to equilibration temperatures higher in type-B1 (390 degreesC) than in type-B2 (370-340 degreesC). We have been able to relate the development of the different microfabric types to the successive stages of deformation of the Alpi Apuane metamorphic complex. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available